i picked up a tweet earlier today from @mike_rat concerning the possible/probable introduction of GPA (Grade Point Average) scores. this emanates from the UK’s Higher Education Academy facilitating a discussion on the introduction of GPA in the UK.
alongside this a number of UK universities are considering introducing GPA unilaterally (i think).
i am not sure why this particular item caught my attention, and why it ‘troubled’ me. i paused, and tried to locate where the feeling for this piece of news resided. i felt my heart pounding – like a flight/fight response. for a moment i wondered whether this was just an effect of the viral flu i have been suffering and/or the tinnitus.
for reasons i am still unsure of (and mike was very accommodating to my strange intervention) i tweeted these lines from the Tao Te Ching:
“Fill your bowl to the brim and it will spill. Keep sharpening your knife and it will blunt.” Lao Tzu, Tao Te Ching
what on earth did i mean? more properly, what on earth did these words mean to me and how did i think they related to the introduction of GPA?
the tweet appeared just after i had sent a student a very strongly worded email detailing how their draft dissertation would not pass the grade. all the way through reading and commenting on their work i struggled with what we ‘scientifically’ call formative and summative evaluation. how NEUTRAL these words appear.
i wanted to ENCOURAGE the student’s efforts, enthusiasm for the topic, commitment to social justice. i wanted to coach her in skills and tricks of the trade that could enable her to communicate her meaning more clearly. i still hold to what i said, to those nurturing comments in bold. as i wrote those comments, thought those thoughts, offered my own experience, i thought of what this degree might mean for her. i thought about the personal-emotional-financial investment, how this could be more than a private act as much as a family and communal act. i thought about my responsibility in enabling her to SUCCEED.
and then i thought about the network of texts into which she was now inserted – application forms, grade sheets, dissertation cover sheets, applications for extension, student progress reports, etc. i felt the weight of this. i knew she would be judged harshly and that i had better get in first so that she had some chance to get through with something that would affirm her.
so, she was attempting to pour nourishment into her bowl.
i contemplated grading her according to our 100 point scale, index her successes and failures according to percentage points against each descriptor.
i contemplated, in other words, to dehumanise what was an absolutely human endeavour.
i contemplated reducing her fears and hopes, anxieties and dreams to mere numbers.
i contemplated asking her to fill her bowl to the brim rather than choose carefully the food that nourishes, because filling to overflow appears more valued than the wisdom that might arise from her educational engagement.
and the knife that is blunted? the GAP perhaps; every technology of division and discrimination.
i know how students (i am one now myself) may welcome the detailed gradation offered by GPA systems. i know for myself how attracted i am to the descriptors and 100 point scale offered by our masters courses compared to the pass/fail on our professional doctorates. i know how as a teacher they help me direct attention to specific areas for development and to make my job of commenting easier when i am tired and find ‘creating’ hard. but surely these things come AFTER.
they come AFTER the relationship that is at the core of learning (relationship between teacher and student, between student and knowledge collectively produced over millennia).
they come AFTER the creation of knowledge that is the product of the uncertainty inherent in those relationships, the fact that we come to KNOW because we realise we don’t know, or see things as new, or come to KNOW what was formerly FELT.
they come AFTER we contemplate the WHY. why is this (degree, topic, writing, etc.) of value to THIS PERSON in the fulness of their living. all else is simply the games we play or are inclined to play in the context of ‘globalisation of higher education’. we know that the GPA will not change the basic discriminatory structure of global higher education.
“Every day, priests minutely examine the Law
And endlessly chant complicated sutras.
Before doing that, though, they should learn
How to read the love letters sent by the wind and rain,
the snow and moon.
before we get caught up in how best to grade we should consider how we read the love letters!